Showing posts with label Opinion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Opinion. Show all posts

Monday, March 23, 2026

Church Policy Has Progressive's Going Nuts!

   

 This is just a quick comment on a change in church policy.

The Church just announced that Sunday School presidencies previously staffed by men, can now be filled by women.  This gives wards and branches the freedom to call sisters to these callings.  Usually, most wards or branches have more active women than men so this can help in keeping callings filled.  I don't think that was the reason for the change, but that's one of the results.  Many have touted that this change is the church moving closer to giving the priesthood to women.  I think that is a ludicrous conclusion.  Sunday school has little to do with ordinances, but everything to do with teaching.  I wanted to post this because there are some out there, including the rag newspaper The Salt Lake Tribune, who spin this change as a big deal.  I think it's good to have women's insight into the running of an organization and a women's touch and inspiration on teaching in the church.  I like the change, but I don't think it's what others say it is. The Trib said it has to do with equity, I don't agree.  Everything the Trib sees the church do has to do with social crap.  Not everything fits the Tribs view of woke baloney.  The Church does not think about feminism like some do. Some have seen this a "progressive" move.  I don't agree.  But then I don't usually agree with progressive thinking.

What does this have to do with guns?  Nothin'. But any chance I have to take a shot at the Trib is a good day!

Semper Paratus

Check 6

Burn

Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Hard Times Create Strong Men and Teaching Resilient Children

 Contrary to widespread belief, the quote “Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times” is not an ancient proverb or classical philosophical insight. Instead, it originates from the mind of G. Michael Hopf, an American author and U.S. combat veteran born in 1970, who included this line in his 2016 post-apocalyptic novel “Those Who Remain,” the seventh book in his “New World” series.


In the early 1970s, scientist John B Calhoun conducted his famous “Universe 25” experiment, creating a “mouse utopia” with unlimited food, water, and shelter.  In these ideal conditions, the mouse population grew rapidly before collapsing as social behaviors deteriorated and reproduction ceased.  While not a literal prediction, the experiment serves as a powerful metaphor for how prosperity and social disconnection can erode purpose and cohesion in human societies.


American society is not yet in collapse, but fragmentation is evident: deep political polarization, eroded trust in institutions, and fading shared norms.  Many retreats into online echo chambers, curating realities that shield them from real-world friction.  This produces phenomena resembling Universe 25’s “isolated females” (seen in aggressive or entitled behaviors like “Karens”) and “beautiful males” (withdrawn, self-focused, feminized men).


Both on the left and the right, good times have allowed us to forget what we learned in the hard times that got us through those hard times into the good. Should we not soon turn back, both the left and right will have to relearn.

 

Hard times have a lot of complications for the weak that created them.  Particularly for the LDS priesthood holder.  It’s more than just being a wimp.  It’s being afraid of change and your shadow.  It’s dealing with “woke” ideas and becoming self-sufficient so that you can raise self-sufficient children.

 

Brothers it doesn’t take that much to change the men in the church.  Don’t accept woke ideas.  Call out those leaders who are trying to make this church like our government.  Remind everyone of the doctrine behind “The family a proclamation to the world.”  I’m not saying we should be unkind or mean, but we need to be bold about the truth and about our lives.

Years ago, I lived in a District and a Branch.  I was called to the District High Council.  I had a District President who was from Minnesota.  He and I did not agree politically.  But we were friends and enjoyed talking with each other to get that other view. In one particular meeting he would not stop talking about a particular political subject.  He wanted to debate and I kept telling him that this was not the time or place for such a discussion.  He would not let up and so I finally said some rude things that silenced the room.  (The good brother sitting next to me whispered to me, “Now you’ve done it!  Good job!”) Most people would not talk to a priesthood leader that way.  I would normally not talk that way to my priesthood leader either but I had to jar him back into reality so he would stop trying to talk about inappropriate things in a meeting where other things should be happening.  My tactic worked!  Later on, I apologized and he said, “You had to shock me back into reality.  I know you didn’t have a choice because I was not listening.”  I was glad he understood and our relationship was not damaged.  Over the years you have learned that you can stand up to a priesthood leader if you do it in a respectful and kind way.  Many people will not do this, but a left-leaning leader can do a lot of damage in a ward.  Politics doesn’t belong in Church.  But many people let their extreme views, left or right leaning, spill into their teaching and speaking at Church.  If that view is in opposition to gospel doctrine it must be corrected. The Church has solid stances on Gay marriage, abortion, and gender.  I don’t have a problem with the people that believe in opposition to this doctrine, but these points are non-negotiable.  And they have no place at Church.  Many believe the Church will “come around” concerning these doctrines and that the Church will change.  My contention is that will never happen.  Policy changes, doctrine does not.

Learning to be a man and then stepping into that role is something that seems to be lacking in some generations.  My kids were given responsibility early in their lives.  We have a large family and we all needed to help to care for ourselves, and our home.  Kids have an amazing capacity.  They can do a lot!  At 8 our kids learned, and were responsible for, their own laundry.  When our Grandkids visit they are given the same responsibility at the appropriate age.  Our kids also had chores they got allowance for but also some they had to do out of duty being a member of the family.  I made sure they understood that because we do have an obligation to each other as family members.

 

 Teaching boys to be men and raising resilient kids so they don’t have to take resilience classes should be every parent’s goal.  The Church now offers resiliency classes, I understand why.  It’s taught in seminary now. What the heck?  I’m an LDS Seminary graduate but I never had a class or a lesson in being resilient.  My Dad fought in WWII.  My parents went through that world war and through the Depression.  They could handle whatever was put before them. So, they raised us kids to weather whatever storm they were put through.  My wife and I were children of the 60’s and 70’s.  We were taught how to work and how to survive.  

 

The men of the church need to stop being “nice” and start being men. Being nice is not the same as being kind. We should be kind. Families need to be resilient because Christ is coming. Looking at the signs we know life is poised to be worse. Certain prophecies must be fulfilled and that means things will get worse in this world. We need men who will bear up the church and the gospel. We should be defenders of the faith. It’s hard to defend from a safe space. LDS men should be meek but not push overs. That’s why boys need to be taught to be men. 

 

“Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times”

 

We are moving into those “hard times”. LDS men and boys need to learn what the 3 P’s are from the Proclamation on the Family. 

What does it mean to preside, provide, and protect?

That’s what we can talk about and teach. Dirty Civilian focus on the Christian preparedness side. The LDS perspective is similar, but with the priesthood comes a higher responsibility.

Boys (and girls for that matter) need to learn physical work.  One of my sons is a computer developer.  One is a welder.  They grew up the same, but the welder likes physical work for his mind and body.  The developer takes care of himself and exercises, but he prefers the more cerebral work of working on software.  Both of them (and our daughters and other brothers) moved rocks.  When we bought our property there was a large pile of stone with rocks about the size of 2 bricks.  We seemed to need this rock pile moved for construction projects and other reasons to move the location of the stone.  So, our kids were given so many rocks to move when they got in trouble.  We did spank our kids but not that often and even less as they got older.  They were given work in addition to the chores they already had.  They were given other tasks sometimes and not always rock moving.  It was physically hard work, but they knew if they complained they could get more rocks.  All my kids know how to work.  It’s interesting because the guys my girls married aren’t necessarily DIY guys.  So, my girls have tool bags, and they work on things as they need to.  Their spouses are getting better, but my girls are hard workers.

One of our family’s sayings is actually from my son-in-law.  “Suck it up, cupcake!” With this mindset our children were not raised to need safe spaces and could handle most everything that has been thrown at them.  They are resilient. I believe it’s our responsibility as parents to bring up our children to handle life and what it throws at you.  To learn from adversity and to become stronger from trials.

There are generations that are soft because their parents wanted things better for them.  I understand that feeling but fight it and teach them how to navigate life themselves.

I had a Stake President growing up who was a millionaire.  His children did not know until they were young adults.  The kids had work at home and jobs to pay for cars and college.  Dad could have just paid for it all, but he and his wife wanted resilient, prepared children.

I hope the men in the church can figure this problem out and stop producing unprepared, dependent children.  I also hope they can change the way the church does things and stop being so timid about running the Lord’s Church.

 

Semper Paratus

Check 6

Burn

Tuesday, February 10, 2026

Please Listen With Spiritual Ears: Lovely Conspiracy (repost from 1 MAR 2016)

I know what you're thinking, "That Burn has finally gone off his rocker!"  Mostly I would agree but hear me out.  These are the last days.  Conspiracies do exist.  The crazy Epstein situation is a conspiracy come to light.  We need to be "awake to a sense of your awful situation."  Thus, I feel this way.  Defense is being aware of threats and fortifying against them.  If nothing else, I can entertain with my extreme ideas...

March 1, 2016
I love the show/movie The X Files. When I was young, I watched a show that was first aired in 1974 through 1975 called “Kolchak: The Night Stalker”. How I loved this show! This was about a newspaper reporter investigates strange supernatural occurrences in Chicago. It was the forerunner to the X Files. I liked these shows because I am somewhat of a nerd as my daughter likes to say. But mostly I liked the X Files because of the conspiracy behind the stories of space aliens. I have never been a fan of our government. Don’t get me wrong, The Republic is a wonderful form of government. But that kind of money and power is not to be trusted. That is why the founders gave us the 2nd Amendment. To keep our leaders in check a little bit. So, I am a conspiracy nut. I question some things that have happened. My wife is similar, but we don’t always agree on which events are conspiracies. When something significant happens in the world or this country, I usually default to whether a conspiracy was involved. Now to be truthful, I may joke about it or even have a passing wonder, but really for the most part, I don’t feel most things are a conspiracy. The problem is, some of them are. I can’t prove anything but it’s hard to believe that no events have a conspiracy behind them. Why do I think this way? Before you blame it on too much TV and movies, let’s look at things that I believe are true.

Apostle Ezra Taft Benson said this in Conference April 1972
“Now undoubtedly Moroni could have pointed out many factors that led to the destruction of the people, but notice how he singled out the secret combinations, just as the Church today could point out many threats to peace, prosperity, and the spread of God’s work, but it has singled out the greatest threat as the godless conspiracy. There is no conspiracy theory in the Book of Mormon —it is a conspiracy fact.”
In Ether 8:18 it says:
“18 And it came to pass that they formed a secret combination, even as they of old; which combination is most abominable and wicked above all, in the sight of God;”
This is why I believe as I do. These conspiracies, or secret combinations, will get above us.
Also in Ether 8
“23 Wherefore, O ye Gentiles, it is wisdom in God that these things should be shown unto you, that thereby ye may repent of your sins, and suffer not that these murderous combinations shall get above you, which are built up to get power and gain—and the work, yea, even the work of destruction come upon you, yea, even the sword of the justice of the Eternal God shall fall upon you, to your overthrow and destruction if ye shall suffer these things to be.
24 Wherefore, the Lord commandeth you, when ye shall see these things come among you that ye shall awake to a sense of your awful situation, because of this secret combination which shall be among you; or wo be unto it, because of the blood of them who have been slain; for they cry from the dust for vengeance upon it, and also upon those who built it up.”
Have we as the LDS Church become “awake to a sense of your awful situation”? If now is not that time prophesied in those scriptures then I’m not sure when they will happen. I believe this is happening now. These are some more reasons for my thinking.
Secret combinations have secret signs and words (Helaman 6:22), protect one another (Helaman 6:21, 23), and mingle into society in a manner whereby they cannot be found (Helaman 1:12).
The teachings and practices of the robbers are tempting and corrupt the hearts of the people as they spread, eventually even seducing most of the righteous into believing in their works, partaking of their spoils, and even becoming involved in their secret murders and combinations (Helaman 6:38; Ether 9:6).
One of the purposes of secret combinations is to gain power (Helaman 2:8; Ether 8:23, 11:15) by usurping power and authority over the people (Helaman 7:4). They seek to gain sole power over the government and, in the Book of Mormon, were successful in doing so (Helaman 6:39).
Secret combinations seek to overthrow government (3 Nephi 7:6), establish kings – or oligarchies (see Mosiah 29:21–22) – and destroy the liberty of a republic (3 Nephi 6:30, 7:10); the king-men believe they have the blood of nobility (Alma 51:21).
“And do not think that these usurpations, intimidations, and impositions are being done to us through inadvertence or mistake; The whole course is deliberately planned and carried out; its purpose is to destroy the Constitution and our constitutional government; then to bring chaos, out of which the new Statism with its slavery is to arise, with a cruel, relentless, selfish, ambitious crew in the saddle, riding hard with whip and spur, a red-shrouded band of night riders for despotism.” (J. Reuben Clark, jr.,Church News, September 25, 1949)
“Gadianton robbers fill the judgement seats in many nations. An evil power seeks to overthrow the freedom of all nations and countries.” (Apostle Bruce R. McConkie, speaking in the April 1980 General Conference)
“It is the terrorist organizations that must be ferreted out and brought down. We of this Church know something of such groups. The Book of Mormon speaks of the Gadianton robbers, a vicious, oath-bound, and secret organization bent on evil and destruction. In their day they did all in their power, by whatever means available, to bring down the Church, to woo the people with sophistry, and to take control of the society. We see the same thing in the present situation.” (Gordon B. Hinckley, General Conference, October, 2001)
Because of these scriptures and quotes, and more, I believe this conspiracy is alive and well and doing the work of the adversary.
There are others who feel the same as I in, and out, of the Church.
http://www.nachumlist.com/deadpool.htm
I only bring this “crazy talk” up because it does affect you and your family’s security and defense. If you can get your own houses in order and prepare for the worse but hope for the best then you and your loved ones will weather the storm better and survive.
Here are books I would recommend to “corrupt your brain” (said with tongue in cheek) with information. Some members will try to wave you off of this kind of thinking. Do not let them. The scriptures and prophets are clear, we must become educated and awake to our awful situation.
None Dare Call It Conspiracy (Gary Allen) – recommended in Conference by Ezra Taft Benson
(I can remember my Dad having a case of these in his study. I guess he was spreading the word)
The Naked Communist (W. Cleon Skousen) – recommended in Conference by David O. McKay
The Naked Capitalist (W. Cleon Skousen) – important sequel to The Naked Communist
The 5000-Year Leap (W. Cleon Skousen) – perhaps the most well-read LDS work on liberty
The Elders of Israel and the Constitution (Jerome Horowitz) – Recommended in Conference by Ezra Taft Benson
The Book of Mormon and the Constitution (H. Verlan Andersen) – LDS General Authority and very close friend to Ezra Taft Benson
The Moral Basis of a Free Society (H. Verlan Andersen)
An Enemy Hath Done This (Ezra Taft Benson, compilation of political speeches)
The Law (Frederic Bastiat) – not an LDS author but quoted heavily by Ezra Taft Benson
Prophets, Principles, And National Survival (Compiled by Jerrald L. Newquist) Quotes of the brethren published in 1964
These are just a beginning. There are many talks and books on this subject out there. I would caution you to not go crazy with this. It can be scary or at least become obsessive. Also, many LDS members, including local leaders, have a problem with this thinking and with this information. If you feel compelled to share, do so prayerfully and with restraint. I have argued with members who can’t seem to give me an answer why these scriptures exist. Why was President Benson so adamant about all of this? Was he the “nutty” Apostle and Prophet? One thing I noticed about President Benson that I like to share is he worked in government. He was hand-picked by U.S. President Eisenhower to be the Secretary of Agriculture from 1952 to 1960. He had been ordained an Apostle in 1943. He saw government up close and personal. He knew how it worked intimately. As an Apostle he wrote and spoke extensively about conspiracy. In 1985 he became the Lords Prophet. His counselors were President Hinckley and President Monson. As Prophet I think he looked for a way to continue his warning and he found that way.
He said in April Conference 1986:
"The Book of Mormon has not been, nor is it yet, the center of our personal study, family teaching, preaching, and missionary work. Of this we must repent" (Ensign 16 [May 1986]:5-6).
This is how we can learn of secret combinations (conspiracies) and how to recognize them. I believe it is too late to stop them, but we can be prepared to fight them and help our families to survive their influence.
I will also add, vote. I know it seems useless sometimes, but vote anyway.
Semper Paratus
Check 6
Burn

Friday, January 30, 2026

Insurrection: Now and in the Future

 This is a post attributed to Warrant Officer Eric Schwalm, an Army Special Forces Green Beret.  I researched Eric, well not really “researched” and I couldn’t find anything substantial about him.  Does he exist?  I don’t know, but I also don’t really care.  I have plenty of sources to verify the tactics he describes in his post.  I ran them by a Green Beret, and a Navy Seal, both retired.  The insurgency tactics are legitimate. My Green Beret instructed for several years on counterinsurgency at the War college.

In what I’ve seen, and that’s only what mainstream media will show me, this is organized insurgency.  Minnesota government and law enforcement are all guilty of conspiracy.  I hate to say it, but ICE should have been pulled out long ago.  That’s not giving in to terrorism, that’s containing it.  ICE should return and then we’ll see how organized it all is.  I predict if they tried that we would see all this “spontaneous protest” would come back again. 

Here is his post in its entirety.

 

"As a former Special Forces Warrant Officer with multiple rotations running counterinsurgency ops—both hunting insurgents and trying to separate them from sympathetic populations—I’ve seen organized resistance up close. From Anbar to Helmand, the pattern is familiar: spotters, cutouts, dead drops (or modern equivalents), disciplined comms, role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly.

 

What’s unfolding in Minneapolis right now isn’t 'protest.' It’s low-level insurgency infrastructure, built by people who’ve clearly studied the playbook.

 

Signal groups at 1,000-member cap per zone. Dedicated roles: mobile chasers, plate checkers logging vehicle data into shared databases, 24/7 dispatch nodes vectoring assets, SALUTE-style reporting (Size, Activity, Location, Unit, Time, Equipment) on suspected federal vehicles. Daily chat rotations and timed deletions to frustrate forensic recovery. Vetting processes for new joiners. Mutual aid from sympathetic locals (teachers providing cover, possible PD tip-offs on license plate lookups). Home-base coordination points. Rapid escalation from observation to physical obstruction—or worse.

 

This isn’t spontaneous outrage. This is C2 (command and control) with redundancy, OPSEC hygiene, and task organization that would make a SF team sergeant nod in recognition. Replace 'ICE agents' with 'occupying coalition forces' and the structure maps almost 1:1 to early-stage urban cells we hunted in the mid-2000s.

 

The most sobering part? It’s domestic. Funded, trained (somewhere), and directed by people who live in the same country they’re trying to paralyze law enforcement in. When your own citizens build and operate this level of parallel intelligence and rapid-response network against federal officers—complete with doxxing, vehicle pursuits, and harassment that’s already turned lethal—you’re no longer dealing with civil disobedience. You’re facing a distributed resistance that’s learned the lessons of successful insurgencies: stay below the kinetic threshold most of the time, force over-reaction, when possible, maintain popular support through narrative, and never present a single center of gravity.

 

I spent years training partner forces to dismantle exactly this kind of apparatus. Now pieces of it are standing up in American cities, enabled by elements of local government and civil society. That should keep every thinking American awake at night.

 

Not because I want escalation. But because history shows these things don’t de-escalate on their own once the infrastructure exists and the cadre believes they’re winning the information war.

 

We either recognize what we’re actually looking at—or we pretend its still just 'activism' until the structures harden and spread.

 

Your call, America. But from where I sit, this isn’t January 2026 politics anymore.

It’s phase one of something we’ve spent decades trying to keep off our own soil. "

-Eric Schwalm, Former Green Beret

 

I also feel this incident is a practice for future problems. When Minnesota ends somewhere else will “pop” up.  I think this is insurgency and I hope the FBI is investigating.  This, in my opinion, is full blown insurrection and nothing like other “protests”.  Watching prior protests, you can see the paid “activists”.  This takes it further and introduces more violence.  As I said before, local law enforcement and elected officials should have a handle on this. 

A crucial, yet little-known, law from 1878 is called the Posse Comitatus Act. This Act is a strong legal firewall built to separate two very different worlds: the world of the U.S. military, designed to fight foreign enemies, and the world of domestic law enforcement, responsible for keeping the peace at home. The founders of the United States were deeply suspicious of “standing armies” being used against the population, fearing it was a classic tool of tyranny. The Posse Comitatus Act is the modern embodiment of that fear. It establishes a fundamental rule: the U.S. Army and Air Force cannot be used as a domestic police force. While this firewall is strong, it's not absolute. It has critical, and often controversial, exceptions for emergencies like insurrection or natural disaster, making it one of the most important laws governing the balance of power and liberty in America.

I know for a fact that this Act has been ignored more than once.  It is a little ambiguous with insurrection.  Who decides if an event is insurrection or not?  But Special Operations (SO) has a better handle on squashing insurrection than law enforcement (LE).  I have nothing against LE.  I think we have the best in the world.  But I have a problem with LE’s command structure and their close over-sight from civilian politicians.  Police Chiefs often come with Mayoral connections.  Sherriff’s and DA’s are elected so they can be politically motivated.  SO is mission oriented.  I’m not advocating breaking the law by not keeping Posse Comitatus, but something needs to change.  Even SWAT teams are not as effective against U.S. citizens.  Police Chiefs need to learn from the military.  They say they don’t want to militarize the police, but I say why the heck not?  Why are military ways so repulsed by politicians and the public?  We trust the military to fight against our foreign aggressors and don’t question their tactics, why is domestic so different?  I think domestic is much worse because these are citizens that enjoy the freedoms of this great country and then they take that as a license to do what they want!  Anyway, that just my opinion.  I don’t think we need tanks in the town square like Tiananmen Square in China! But a good SO team could take this type of insurrection on with no problem. 

But politicians in Minnesota are not very worried about taking care of this rather than running their narrative.  But the whole point to this post is that this is not really the first time and it will not be the last.  Be prepared if you find yourself near these protests.

Semper Paratus

Check 6

Burn

Tuesday, December 23, 2025

Merry Christmas and Trying to Not Offend

In the name of Christmas and peace on earth, I repost this little ditty that I believe promotes kindness and having thicker skin.  I hope you and yours has a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, or a Happy Holiday... Not that there's anything wrong with that..

 Everyone does it. Most people don't really want to offend anyone. Sometimes we try to clarify what we mean and sometimes that comes across as being politically correct. In some ways it is.

Do you remember the Seinfeld episode called “The Outing”? In this episode George and Jerry are mistakenly viewed as being gay. As they discuss this, they deny it by saying, “We’re not Gay! …not that there’s anything wrong with that…”
Well, this is a typical person trying not to be offensive. They are being politically correct.
I think that it’s not a horrible thing to not want to be offensive. We all should be more kind. But sometimes that can be to the extreme …not that there’s anything wrong with that…
Here’s the deal. There’s a fine line between political correctness and not being offensive. I think I may have been seen as being racist or sexist at times. I don’t think that I am. I don’t want anyone to be discriminated against because of race or gender. We should give people the benefit of the doubt. But I also think that we should not be stupid with this and call everyone who may not get along with other cultures a racist. There are times when all of us have a personality clash with another person. Sometimes the foundation of that difference may have to do with a cultural difference. Often cultural differences mean a different race. If I don’t agree with “Black Lives Matters” does that make me racist if I am a different race? I don’t think it does, but many people like to throw out their race card.
Today, we’re left to deal with the dangers of our politically correct society; one where society paints good guys as bad. If you choose to carry a firearm, defend yourself, or even consider taking another human’s life to protect a loved one, you’re demonized. It’s a sad state indeed, but we’re finally reaping what we’ve sowed.
Why is this such a hard concept to grasp and why is there so much push back? My gut tells me it’s simply about control. There are many groups within our country who don’t want life, liberty or the pursuit of happiness to be extolled. Instead, they want you to fall in line and live according to their ideas. If that notion doesn’t scare the crap out of you, then you’re probably on the wrong side of this discussion.
I loved growing up as a kid, sleeping with my windows open and sometimes even the doors open. It was a great time to be a kid for sure, but today we live in a drastically different world.
It shouldn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out many crimes are targeted against defenseless or weak targets. I wonder why that is; I wonder if we could look at the animal kingdom and see a similar pattern? Could it be that the lioness is chasing after the weaker of the prey in order to guarantee a meal? If she fails to catch and kill her prey, she doesn’t eat. It really is that simple; in order to increase the chances of success, evil will choose the weaker or soft target.
A new study released by Stanford University entitled “Mass Shootings of America” or MSA has determined that most mass shootings were largely conducted in “gun free” zones. No kidding? I think I’ll fall over and die from that surprise (dripping with sarcasm). If anyone is still convinced gun free zones are safe, they’re ignorant.
“The definition of mass shooting used for the Stanford database is 3 or more shooting victims (not necessarily fatalities), not including the shooter. The shooting must not be identifiably gang or drug related. The motive typically appears to be indiscriminate killing.”
If we know they’ll more than likely target gun free zones, what can we do to help deter them from doing so? Many are quick to comment that the presence of armed, uniformed officers or security guards is enough and while I believe it’s a step in the right direction, it’s not the only solution.
Being politically correct gets people killed. I’m not advocating being racist, sexist, or just plain mean. But we should be able to speak plainly. We have been attacked by Islamic extremists. Is it too much to ask that we are careful with Muslims coming into this country? Is it too much to ask that an American Muslim do their best to show their patriotism and allegiance to the U.S.? I know this is not particularly fair, but it is reality. Black people have dealt with this unfairly for years. If you want change in this country, you must be patient. Sometimes a generation must pass away. I hope that is not the case with real change. My Grandfather fired hands on his farm in the 40’s because they were treating paid black farm hands horribly. He was from a generation where discrimination against blacks was very common, but he understood how wrong it was.
We can be this way too. We can recognize how wrong it is to profile people and to stereotype them into any type of pigeonhole. We can see people for who they are regardless of their culture or skin color. There are jerks and idiots of every color.
The First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees that I can say whatever I want in this country. There is a reason that this is the first amendment of the Bill of rights. Many of the other bills are connected to this free expression. But also, you will notice that the very first thing that the forefathers of this country wanted to establish was freedom of religion. Religion was before free speech in this amendment. I think that is significant.
Everyone has an opinion. Everyone should be able to express that opinion. I feel that illegal aliens in this country should not be able to enjoy the fruits of this country. My opinion is that what part of “illegal” do we not understand? If I do something illegal, I must pay the price of that broken law. Does this make me anti-Mexican? I don’t think it does. Talk to a Border Patrol agent and he will tell you he gets just as many OTM’s (other than Mexican) trying to enter this country illegally. Immigration is not just about Mexicans. Liberal thinking sometimes makes me want to be that “ugly conservative”. Liberal views often paint anyone against typical liberal causes, like immigration, as racists. I think President Obama has perpetuated this ridicules attitude. I’m not a Donald Trump fan, but he often says things that he feels and is labeled for it. Politically correct people often paint the first amendment as something that is limited to agreeing with them. Sometimes freedom of speech is not nice. This is where I think people should be kind, not politically correct.
There is a comic strip where a black boy says to his white friend “I like being black.” The white boy says “I like being white”. The last panel is the black boy saying, “Racist!” This is how it has become. There are times when I agree with the T-shirt slogan I saw the other day:
“Politically Correct
A term used to describe whiney, overly sensitive pansies who need the big, bad, real world all sugar-coated.” There is another that I will end this article with.
“You find it offensive? I find it funny. That’s why I’m happier than you.”
Semper Paratus
Check 6
Burn

Thursday, December 18, 2025

Hoplophobia: That Dreaded Decease

 Hoplology isn’t exactly a household word, so before I get too far with this post I had better define my key term.  Hoplology– derived from “hoplos,” a type of Ancient Greek fighter– is essentially the study of human combative behavior.  Personally, I like to think of it as a quirky branch of anthropology.  Some anthropologists might visit a tribe in a remote corner of the world and study that tribe’s traditional forms of dance, trying to use the dance as a lens to better understand the tribe’s culture.  A hoplologist would want to learn more about the tribe by examining their fighting methods– what do the types of weapons that they use tell us about their culture?  Does the fact that their fighting techniques focus on wrestling tell us something about their society?  Can we learn something from the way that they conceptualize the act of combat?

I have a phobia for doctors.  That is not true, I have an aversion to doctors.  It’s not quite a phobia.  After my combat experience I saw a psychologist and he drove me crazy.  If you ask someone 2,342 times how violence makes them feel rest assured, they will commit violence on you.  I’m not completely knocking the mental health field, but sometimes they do more damage than the original trauma the patient experienced. 

“Hoplophobia is a mental disturbance characterized by irrational aversion to weapons, as opposed to justified apprehension about those who may wield them.”  Lt Col Jeff Cooper

This is the definition of the word that Jeff Cooper first coined.  I see it all the time.  I had a coworker tell me his wife would not let him get a gun even though both of them felt the need for a means to defend their young family.  I told him about hoplophobia and that it is an irrational worry.  Sadly, the bumper sticker is correct, “Guns don’t kill people, People do.”  I told him to find a afternoon when they could meet me at the range.

We found an afternoon and I was ready.  First, we talked about the logical reasons for her fear, which are not really logical but emotional.  I talked about her gun training.  She said she didn’t have any gun training.  I said, “Yes you do!”  Then we talked about the false training that comes for Hollywood and the media.  We were at the range so there was someone else there shooting but several bays away.  Every time there was a shot she jumped.  I gave her some headsets and that helped.  We talked about how guns are just inanimate objects and that they don’t just go off without human interaction.  I kept all the guns in cases on another table.  We talked about gun safety, and we used a “rubber” gun.  It was a natural conversation, and she was put at ease.

Then I showed her a .22 Long round.  Then I brought out a Ruger 10/22, and we talked about the rifle.  We practice rounds I showed her how to load the magazine.  Then, reminding her of the safety rules we talked about, I handed her the rifle, and she loaded the magazine and charged a round.  She then cycled the gun until the 5 rounds from the magazine were all out.

We then talked again about the safety rules, and I gave her some live rounds.  She loaded the magazine.  I handed her the rifle again and she chambered a round.  We talked about aiming and sight picture.  She took the rifle and sighted in on the target and squeezed the trigger.  I had her shoot the 5 rounds I had her load.  We made the gun safe and went to look at her shots.  She had an impressive group with one flyer.  We talked about those 5 shots and went back to the bench.  She loaded and shot 10 more shots.  Then there were 10 more and repeated the process.  I then had her make the gun safe, put the rifle aside, and then we talked.  We talked about her shots, aim, grip, trigger discipline, breathing, all over again.  We touched again on safety then talked about the experience.  I asked her if it was a frightening experience.  She said once she understood the safety rules and why we have them, and understood how to operate the gun, she was actually having fun!  I said it was what I said when we started, “Education changes everything.”  We did similar things with a handgun, and she even shot a 9mm and a .38.  The fear was gone. Replaced by education and fun!  The mystery and false teaching melted away, and she learned to safely control and use a firearm.  She suffered from Hoplophobia, the irrational fear of weapons. 

There are many that suffer from this.  But the media is the worst purveyor of misinformation and downright lies concerning guns.  The anti-gun people are not always bad about this, especially if they are taught truth and given good education.  Most people react like my coworkers wife.  Often many can be brought over to our side with the same type of experience.  So, if you witness some idiot that think it’s funny to give a 12 guage to a petite woman and watch her get beat because of inadequate training, and no safety education, stop the travesty.  And those who are guilty of this are usually not anti-gun.  We want more rational people in our corner and these dangerous, bad experiences just hurt our cause.  Also, stop doing stupid things with guns.  Learn and keep the rules.  Teach with patience and a real interest in making that first range time for the inexperienced person a good experience.  Remember the safety rules:

1.       All guns are always loaded

2.      Never point a gun at anything you’re not willing to destroy

3.      Keep your finger off the trigger and out of the trigger guard until your sights are on the target

4.      Know your target and beyond the target

We as gun advocates need to be calm and rational in a crazy irrational world.  Some anti-gun people are nuts.  Completely unapproachable and unwilling to learn.  But most people will learn and understand better.  It may not make them gun people, but at least they have a better understanding that the hype created by the media is not true.

Semper Paratus

Check 6

Burn