Saturday, September 11, 2021

"Run, Hide, Fight" Can Kill You

I just went through this training again. Run, Hide, Fight! I am re-posting this article from December 2019 about the flaws in this training that is used so often. In 2017 in a church in Sutherland Springs, Texas 2 people were killed but the gunman was killed by a parishioner who had volunteered to be on a security team. There is video of the shooting if you can handle that sort of reality. This made me think about the governments "Run, Hide, Fight" (RFH) campaign. The shooting in Texas was over in seconds. The RFH would have done no one any good. Security on the spot made the difference. There were 7 people armed in that church that we can see in the video. These church security teams have some type of training usually. There was 250 people in that church. Two were killed before the gunman was stopped by someone else with a gun. I have worked for the federal government in one capacity or another my entire adult life. The training we receive is RFH. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints have also adopted this training. I fear for those who put so much stock in this training. Let me explain why. RFH is a soft response to hard violence. The problem with RFH is that it does not teach about the extreme violence that a mass shooter is. It does not teach the importance of being ready mentally for this type of attack. It does not talk about the normalcy bias that most people experience during a violent encounter. Living in North America most people are relatively safe most of the time and their "normal" does not involve violence. I think that's one of the great benefits of living in the U.S. But it does foster an inadequate mindset of "All is well." This can be dangerous because there is usually a Afreeze@ before the fight or flight response. That is sometimes precious seconds that could be used to run or hide. This is a definition of the freeze from a 2010 article by Dr. David Golstein "The fight-or-flight response, also known as the acute stress response, refers to a physiological reaction that occurs in the presence of something that is terrifying, either mentally or physically. The response is triggered by the release of hormones that prepare your body to either stay and deal with a threat or to run away to safety." Most people are not prepared for this response and so often nothing actually happens which is what we call freeze. That's where the ADeer in the headlights@ look can come from. It's too bad that RHF doesn=t acknowledge something that most people will experience. There are ways to learn to control this reaction and it has to with a mindset. Preparing for this type of event in your mind can make a difference. Thinking of scenarios AIf someone comes in that door and does this, I=ll do this@ can help if ever faced with the real thing. I know you can't imagine every scenario, but just thinking of a few will put you much further ahead than you would be. It also gives your mind somewhere to go during this type of event that may keep you from freezing. It does work and is used to train tactical teams. I used to teach a tactical response class in the military. I would use an air horn at a particularly quiet moment to demonstrate the way something unusual can get your adrenalin pumping. It was interesting to see the reaction from some battle experienced people who were told it was coming! Another problem with RHF is that it fosters a "checklist" attitude. These events are situationally driven. Sometimes you may have to go straight to Fight because the situation warrants it. But the way RHF is taught Fight is a "last resort". That is not reality and so it teaches you can't fight yet because you haven=t exhausted the run and hide options yet. This can get you killed. It should be taught "Run or Hide or Fight" to be of any advantage to a victim. The RHF system also creates a victim right away without even giving anyone a chance at something else. It creates a non-aggressive mindset when there are many scenarios where those being attacked should be in a self-defense mode rather than a "roll-over-you're-dead" mode. For some reason the general public in the U.S. have this idea that only law enforcement can or will defend you. Law enforcement is the best in the world in this country. But unless you carry an officer in your back pocket or bag they are minutes away! There are politicians and snowflakes out there that would have you believe that only the police can use violence to defend you. Most law enforcement will agree that is simply not true, yet it is still perpetuated. "Don't fight with your attacker, give them what they want." A purse or wallet is one thing but a woman's virtue is something else! Don't let this false training deceive you! Since Columbine law enforcement has changed its tactics with mass shooters. They used to establish a secure perimeter and wait for SWAT to take out a killer. No longer do they do this. Many people have died with this tactic. Law enforcement has changed, and you should too. Don't let anyone teach you that running and hiding are the first things you should do in an active shooter situation. Don't misunderstand, running and hiding are very good options. They can save many lives. But situational awareness is the most important skill along with a quick threat assessment. Learn about your options. Get trained so that when fight is the best and first option, you=ll be ready. Try to teach others, politicians and leaders, that gun free zones are where people die. Give us the options to get trained and to defend ourselves. If there is one thing we can learn from the tragedy in another Texas Church, it's that someone armed and even trained basically can save lives and make the difference. Don=t be a victim, get training and practice what you learn. Semper Paratus Check 6 Burn PS I do not think RHF training is very good, but it is something. Take out some of the flaws and include situational awareness and this would be better training. You can do this yourself. Take lame training, and turn it into something that makes a difference.

2 comments:

  1. Since I am always carrying, including in GFDZ's (Gun Free Death Zones) I prefer the "Shoot-Kill-The End" method.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I 1000% agree with your assessment. I taught tactical firearms training in law enforcement for several years in Georgia and developed our County's first SWAT team. I taught aggressive actions including, hands on. POST Council in Georgia said my style was TOO aggressive. They could not deny my courses of fire as they complied with "standards" however, the way I taught is what they didn't like. We then developed our County's first SWAT Team, the county administrators echoed POST and said the name/title SWAT was also TOO aggressive. So, in 1986, I created the first CERT program in the State. Critical Emergency Response Team. I think it was picked up by other agencies, who changed the name a bit to fit their particular narrative. The only reason I even make mention of that here is, a couple of years ago, there was a direct imminent threat made to Nauvoo, Ward and Stake. When several of us went to the Bishop to seek permission for there to be security teams created. He flatly denied it saying that, "if we members die by the hands of other while we are worshiping, what more surety do we need that we will stand before the bar of judgement and hearing, those words.." Our Sheepdogs, ignored his denial and formed our own roving patrols outside and strategically placed members on the inside of the building. We operated this way for several weeks until, one of the brethren on the team could not stand doing this without consent and when to the Bishop with what we had been doing. It did not go well for any of us. But we still to this day remain vigilant, on guard and ready for whatever, the bad guys want to attempt short of a bio/nuke attack. There is so much more I wanted to include here but for the sake of others, lol, have withheld. Keep up the great things you are doing.

    ReplyDelete