Training Value Part 3-Dry Fire

I have Dry fired for years.  Problem is, I never really had a regular program for dry firing.  I've just started to put together my own dry fire program.  A collection of steps to do it safely, and a collection of drills to work on areas I'm concerned about and to give variety.  As I was researching Dry Fire I came across the following article.  I liked the way they have evaluated Dry Fire to see what skills it helps with.  I include a portion of this article because I think they at Dryfire Mag did a much better job than I could have.  Dryfire Mag is a tool to help in Dry Firing.  I've never used the product but it looks very promising.

From Dryfire Mag 

https://dryfiremag.com/blogs/dryfiremag-blog/dry-fire-vs-live-fire

DRY FIRE VS. LIVE FIRE: WHAT SKILLS TRANSFER THE BEST?              August 08, 2025

 

SKILLS THAT TRANSFER WELL FROM DRY FIRE

The good news is: most foundational shooting skills transfer extremely well from dry fire to live fire. These include:

1. Trigger Control

This is the single most transferable skill.

Dry fire allows you to isolate your trigger press without the noise, recoil, or blast of live fire. You can watch your front sight (or red dot) and get immediate visual feedback on whether you’re moving the gun during the press.

·         Builds proper finger placement

·         Smooths out press mechanics

·         Reduces flinching habits

·         Improves shot anticipation

Pro tip: Use tools like the DryFireMag to simulate trigger reset without racking your slide between reps.

2. Sight Alignment & Sight Picture

Because dry fire gives you a chance to slow down and focus, it's excellent for reinforcing correct sight alignment and visual focus.

·         Helps build consistent alignment

·         Develops fast sight acquisition from the draw

·         Reduces over-confirmation of sights in close distances

·         Encourages more awareness of optic/dot movement

You’ll also learn how your sights behave during transitions, draws, and trigger presses—giving you crucial data you can’t always catch during live fire due to recoil and time pressure.

3. Draw Stroke / Presentation

Drawing from concealment or duty gear in a live environment can be rushed or rushed. Dry fire lets you refine mechanics, reduce wasted motion, and build consistency.

·         Improves grip acquisition

·         Refines speed to presentation

·         Allows high reps in short time

·         Reduces “fishing” for sights

A well-trained draw in dry fire translates directly into faster, more confident live fire performance.

4. Reloads (Emergency & Tactical)

Dry fire is ideal for working reloads, since you’re not under pressure from timers, loud bangs, or brass flying around.

·         Refines mag release & indexing

·         Helps develop 'muscle memory'

·         Perfect for running reps from concealment or gear

·         Enables repetition of specific reload types (speed, retention, admin)

5. Target Transitions

Even without recoil, dry fire allows you to practice visual and physical transitions between multiple targets—especially valuable if you use laser targets or reference points.

·         Builds eye-target-lead habits

·         Reduces over-travel

·         Improves timing and rhythm between shots

6. One-Handed Shooting & Manipulation

Whether dominant or support hand, dry fire gives you the chance to safely build confidence and control using either hand alone.

·         Develops strength and dexterity

·         Reinforces trigger discipline with either hand

·         Prepares you for injury-based scenarios or low-light tool use

7. Movement & Footwork

You can rehearse stepping into positions, slicing the pie around cover, or moving while staying on sights.

·         Practices movement into shooting position

·         Encourages balance and stability

·         Simulates real-world CQB or defensive movement

·         Helps prevent over-exposure in corners or barricades

SKILLS THAT DON’T FULLY TRANSFER FROM DRY FIRE

While dry fire is powerful, there are a few key elements it cannot fully replicate. Understanding these limitations will help you balance your training.

1. Recoil Management

Dry fire doesn’t produce recoil—so it won’t develop the timing, grip pressure, and follow-through required to shoot fast and flat.

·         No muzzle rise

·         No need to manage rapid cycling

·         No recovery between fast shots

This is one reason combining dry fire with live fire—even occasionally—is crucial for well-rounded skill development.

2. Follow-Up Shots (Cadence)

While you can practice simulated double taps or multi-shot drills in dry fire, the real recoil rhythm can only be felt on the range.

·         No recoil impulse

·         No true split-time feedback

·         No real dot/sight lift to control

3. Flinch / Recoil Anticipation Under Pressure

Dry fire helps reduce flinching, but it won’t expose your body to the startle effect of muzzle blast and recoil under real-world stress.

Some flinching only shows up when the bang happens—so live fire is still needed to diagnose and fix these issues fully.

4. Shot Accountability

Unless you're using a laser system or something like Mantis X, dry fire gives you limited feedback about where your shots would land.

·         No paper or steel hits

·         No confirmation of groupings or POI (Point of Impact)

This is where tools like the Smart DryFireMag or dry fire targets with integrated tech come in handy.

Some of the following drills may help in your Dry Fire program:

 1. Trigger Control Drill: Focus on smoothly pulling the trigger without disturbing your sight picture. Start with your firearm aimed at a stable target and slowly squeeze the trigger. Pay attention to any movement in your sights as you pull the trigger. This drill helps improve your trigger control, which is crucial for accurate shooting.

2. Draw and Fire Drill: Practice drawing your firearm from the holster and acquiring your target quickly. Begin with your hands at your sides, draw your firearm, and aim at your target, simulating a real-life scenario. This drill enhances your speed and accuracy, making you more proficient in defensive situations.

3. Reloading Drill: Simulate reloading your firearm to improve your speed and efficiency. Use dummy rounds to practice ejecting the magazine, inserting a new one, and chambering a round. Consistent practice with this drill ensures you can reload quickly and smoothly, which is vital in high-stress situations.

4. Movement Drill: Work on moving and shooting to develop your ability to stay accurate while on the move. Set up multiple targets and practice shooting while walking, sidestepping, or even running. This drill improves your ability to maintain accuracy in dynamic environments.

By regularly incorporating these drills into your dry fire practice, you can develop essential shooting skills and become a more confident and effective shooter. The key is to practice consistently and focus on the fundamental aspects of shooting.

 

Using all the tools available you can maximize the time, energy, and money you put into your personal training and increasing your Training Value.

Semper Paratus 

Check 6

Burn

Changing Hearts and Minds: Teaching Shooting (Repost from 15 November 2017)

Lately I've been approached at the shooting range with requests to help a shooters family member afraid or just against guns.  This old article is exactly how I have dealt with this problem and other problems that arise from someone not educated with guns.  I've done the exact same treatment with someone very anti-gun.  It doesn't change their politics, but it gives them reality based, real experience that they can share with others.  Conservatives aren't the only gun nuts out there!

Burn 

What to do if your wife (or girlfriend, significant other, spouse, mother, for this article I will use wife) doesn’t want you to protect your family with a gun?

I have been a gun guy, shooter, hunter, instructor, for many years. The other night I was a possum killer. (A possum had killed a chicken in our coop.) I like guns and they have been my passion for many, many years. A coworker bought a concealed gun and got his license a few years ago. He is former military so he has a little experience and training. His wife is also former military but is liberal in her point of view. So these two were at an impasse and it was affecting their marriage a little. He came to me and asked if I would teach his wife about guns and try to change her view of them. I said I would teach her safety, how guns work, and how to shoot a gun, but as for changing her view, that was up to her.
I’ve read stories or have seen videos where a person (usually a woman) has been taken to the range for the first time and have been treated pretty poorly by spouse/boyfriend, and instructors. I think the last thing we in the gun world should ever do is try to show off, intimidate, or scare a potential shooter. We have enough problems fighting what stupid people do with guns, what uneducated people and politicians say about guns, without ruining another person who is honestly giving shooting a try.
My experience with my co-worker and his wife went like this.
I told them to meet me at the range and I was a half hour early. I set up some simple targets, just 10 inch paper plates. I brought several handguns with me and even a rifle and shotgun.
The guns I brought were a .22 rifle and pistol, a .380 pistol, a few 9mm pistols, a .38 revolver and an AR and a 20 gage shotgun.
I had the pistols in cases in a bag and had the .22 pistol on the shooting rug. The rifles and shotgun were still in the truck.
When they first arrived we sat on some benches and just chatted. I wanted her to know this is not a high stress environment and to be at ease.
I told her a little about my experience not to brag, but to let her I knew what I was talking about.
I then talked about how I teach safety and even brought out my visual aids that I use. I told both of them the 4 safety rules:
1. All guns are always loaded
2. Never point a gun at anything you’re not willing to destroy
3. Keep your finger off the trigger and out of the trigger guard until you have sights on the target
4. Know your target and what’s beyond that target.
I then gave my usual mini-quiz.
Me: We never point a gun at something we’re not willing to destroy because of what rule?
Answer: Number 1
Me: Correct. Why do you think it’s a good idea to know what’s in back of your target?
Answer: Because paper, cardboard, wood, and even some steel, does not stop bullets and you are responsible for every bullet that leaves your weapon.
Little questions along these lines. Throughout the “course” I continue to ask these questions pertaining to the safety rules. It helps people to know why we have the rules and helps them remember them.
I taught a mini lesson on the parts of a gun, and how to hold, and aim. Some of this was a refresher.
I then had them pick up the .22 and pointed out the controls of that particular gun. I had her load the magazine, and then load the gun, all the time reminding her of aiming techniques and safety.
She shot the .22 and was pretty good. I instructed her to press the trigger instead of slapping it. She shot several magazines and we evaluated her shooting. I then brought out the .380 and 9mm’s. We went through the same routine all the while talking about safety and her experience. I asked about her likes and dislikes. This was turning into a fun experience for her. I threw in some funny stories of experiences I’ve had teaching others and my kids. We moved up in caliber and talked about it. She asked how long I’ve carried and why I carry. I answered honestly and as best as I could. I told her about an experience I had where I used my weapon as a defense. She asked what I carried and why.
I then brought out a .22 rifle. She shot that after a little instruction. I then pulled out an AR-15. She was game to shoot anything by then and she liked the AR experience. I then pulled out the shotgun. I had a hand clay pigeon thrower and we played with that a little.
When we finished I asked her what the 4 safety rules were and she knew them. I then asked which gun she would like to carry and she picked a SKKY CPX-2. I asked her if it was because it was turquoise? I was joking and she did laugh.
I asked her if this experience ended up different than she had anticipated. She admitted that she felt different about guns now. I asked why she thought she felt that way now? She said, “Because I’ve been better educated and I had a positive experience.”
I think that this experience speaks volumes. As gun enthusiasts we need to stop being gun snobs. We need to understand that many people are not as acquainted with guns as we are and that we should patiently teach them. The more positive experiences we can give, the more people we can get who are not hysterical about guns. The more people that will be able to look at guns as tools instead of living organisms with a mind of their own.
As instructors we should be actively looking for ways to make our training less stressful, more fun, and more positive. Guns are a serious business and I’m not suggesting we sacrifice any safety but I’ve been to some courses and ranges that are like shooting in Siberia! I love shooting and enjoy it so much. Sometimes I’ve seen instructors that thought I was betraying the brotherhood of nuclear secrets club because I interjected a little humor into shooting! It’s my passion so let me enjoy it! We win friends and recruit advocates if we teach shooting to be serious but fun. Serious with safety but fun with shooting.
Let me mention jargon. I’ve served on military bases my entire adult life and I use a lot of jargon and acronyms. Shooting is similar. It has a lot of jargon that someone on the outside does not understand. I have a shirt that says “Happiness is zero at 300.” The average person doesn’t know what the heck that means! There are many things I know nothing about. I’m just as ignorant on those subjects as some are about guns. I would hope that someone would patiently teach me or at least speak in laymen’s terms for me to understand. We need to cut out that jargon when training or just taking someone to the range for the first time. There’s no need to humiliate them or to show off our expansive knowledge by using slang, jargon, and acronyms. Be clear in your instruction especially concerning safety.
Caliber is one thing that seems to be the “thing” with guys and their girlfriends at the range. Don’t hand a .44 magnum pistol or a 12 gage short barreled shotgun to a 94 pound, 5 foot 3 20 year old girl! If she wants to shoot it you shoot it first and show her. Warn her and make sure she has a good grip on the weapon and it won’t kick into her face! It’s not funny and it’s potentially a danger. Remember the girl who killed her instructor in Vegas with a full auto weapon? Now he is dead and this poor young girl is scarred for life! How stupid can you be? Gun people have no excuse. Actually most people have no excuse.
Most girls and women are better marksman right out of the box than any guy. They are easier to teach and easier to get along with as an instructor. I remember one particular guy who would not stop arguing with me. He paid for this training! I finally told him I was going to stop the course and give him his money back. He finally shut up. It’s not that he was completely wrong either. But there can only be one teacher because it’s not fair to others.
Make sure if you have not been trained as an instructor that you cover everything. Remember safety first. There are many schools of thought here. I like the Gunsite Academy rules because they are precise, short, and easy to remember. The NRA has their rules that are not bad but I feel more difficult to teach and retain when being taught. Their fundamental rules are exactly like Gunsite’s.
Get a hold of a curriculum and change it to meet your needs. If you’ve been taught you can probably teach. But not necessarily. I’ve heard many who have said that family should not teach family. Especially husband with wife. I think this is absurd. Because you are married to someone does not mean you can’t be patient, tolerant, and kind in teaching them to shoot. I think it may not be for everyone, but most couples may need to re-evaluate their communication skills if they can’t go through a session without damaging their relationship. Some men need to swallow their pride, stop trying to impress everyone, and teach without being condescending and a jerk. Our goal is to arm our spouse and make them safe, not feed our stupid egos.
The topics of a very basic course is:
Safety rules
Different guns and actions (usually a semi-auto and a revolver)
How to shoot (grip, stance, aim, recovery)
We need to change the hearts and minds of most people who are anti-gun. Most of them are not just plain stubborn and only want political gain. Most citizens understand that the police, as good and dedicated as they are, will normally not be able to be there in their time of need. I’ve heard some smugly say we don’t need defense in this day and age. These usually comes from people who have never experienced violence or live in a place where there is little violence. They are under the delusion that it can never happen to them or that it doesn’t happen in this country. That is a pretty crazy notion to most law enforcement. They know the truth about how violent the world is. It seems to be getting worse also. Trying to change people will go no where by insulting and berating them. I admit it’s tempting when they say such stupid things. “A clip should not hold more than 10 bullets.” “No one needs a machine gun.” “There are gun show loop holes.” Yes it’s easy to insult their ignorance. But we should resist and try to intelligently educate them. It’s the only way we can win the fight! (Apart from a good slap!  Kidding, of course :)
Semper Paratus
Check 6
Burn

Defense Wisdom From Porter Rockwell

 A young gunslinger got the drop on Porter Rockwell. “Say your prayers,” he demanded. Rockwell replied, “You wouldn’t try and shoot a man without a cap on your pistol, would you?” The instant the man glanced at his gun, he was blown from his saddle by Rockwell, who had a gun hidden in his pocket. Port understood concealed carry. He also understood the OODA loop and how to use it effectively.

We too can be as wise as Porter Rockwell.

 

Conceal Carry.  Take the time to think about your family's and your personal defense.  When I was going through some weapons training in the military I shot in a shoot house.  If you ever have the opportunity to shoot in a shoot house take that opportunity.  It is a very real type of training.

 

 

One day a Sheriff Reynolds came to the jail and offered Porter a large sum of money if Porter would take him to Joseph Smith so that the Prophet could be captured. “I will see you damned first,” responded Porter.  Not only did Porter defend himself, but he defended Joseph and the Church.  Men and brethren, be like Porter.

 

The philosophy basically is that there are 3 types of people. They are described as Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs. The sheep are mostly people that you know and see. They are good, productive members of society who would not hurt anyone or anything. There is absolutely nothing wrong with being a sheep. Then there are wolves. Wolves are evil, selfish near-humans intent on taking what they want. They are not interested in who they hurt in this process. They are a large minority and many are locked up. Then there are sheepdogs. Sheepdogs care about the sheep even though sometimes the sheep don’t appreciate them. The sheepdogs want the sheep to be safe and to be rid of the wolves. I’ve read so many writers who don’t believe that sheepdogs exist. They think that those who believe themselves to be sheepdogs are camo wearing wanna-bes. I’m sure some Rambo camo wearers do exist. (After all, my favorite color is camo) But I know enough people who, when confronted with violence, go toward it.  They have trained and had experience of warding off violence.  Many are in law enforcement and the military already.  But many were, or lean toward, these sheepdog traits.  I’m not bringing this up to recruit, but to let some closet sheepdogs know that we are out there.  We are everywhere.  One of the problems of those who would subvert our freedoms is that we are there, and they know we are there.  President Biden said we cannot fight F-15’s and tanks.  He is mistaken.  What happened in Viet Nam and Afghanistan?  The former President does not understand.  I believe one of the reasons the Japanese did not invade the U.S. is there is a sheepdog behind every blade of grass.  Now more than ever.

Sheepdogs defend the weak and fight against evil. Sheepdogs in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints should also defend the church.  I’m not saying pick up a weapon and stand a post but fight against those that would disparage and destroy the church.  As of now, I don’t think we need to worry about someone attacking the Church physically.  Although that is increasing. But there are those Zarahemna’s out there.  They are ex members who have “intimate knowledge” of what it’s like to be an "oppressed" member of this Church.  They are usually the same as most exmos (ex-Mormons) I’ve seen since the 70’s.  The Tanner’s, the Dehlin’s, the Kelly’s.  They all have an axe to grind and think they can get their whining way by pulling, oh sorry, “saving” those trying to get out of the Church.  I wonder what they would do if the Church went away?  They would stop making all the money they make from fighting against the Church.  Then they would have to get real jobs.  As you can see, I’m not very charitable to these lowlifes.  I have a hard time dealing with people who leave the church but can’t leave the church alone.  Or those who are more enamored with their cause than the truth.  It’s easy to be an exmo.  Just whine and the woke of the world will follow.  Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not talking about those who honestly leave the Church and move on with their lives.  I’m talking about those activists who don’t believe anymore but are so offended by those who do.

So what do these disgruntled ex-members have to do with the OP Rockwell philosophy?  I think there are certain enemies of the Church we need to keep our eye on.  Some evangelical Christians, fit this category.  But the exmos are an enemy that could turn, or influence others to turn, violent.  The Grand Blanc Michigan shooter had a bad experience with a member that turned him into a killer. But at the same time evangelical leaders were spewing the same "Mormons are anti-Christ" rhetoric that the killer in Michigan had expressed.  Members need to be prepared.  The "run, hide, fight" policy may have killed members in Michigan as the building was set on fire. To the credit of the Grand Blanc Police Department, officers were on site 30 seconds after the 9-1-1 call.  Yet 4 people died and 8 were injured.  8 people were either killed or wounded by the shooter.   4 of the deaths and injuries were from smoke.  I have searched, but not found, the reason the 2 died from smoke inhalation instead of just leaving the building.  I don't know if they were hiding.  But regardless, we need to be prepared in all things.  No one thinks this will happen in their Church until it does.  

According to the Family Proclamation:   

“By divine design, fathers are to preside over their families in love and righteousness and are responsible to provide the necessities of life and protection for their families.”

Protection for their families.  We as Americans give away this responsibility for physical protection to the police.  Yet the police are not, I repeat, not responsible for our safety.  The Supreme Court said that police have no obligation to protect citizens. In 1989 and 2005 the Supreme Court made that ruling regardless of what it might say on their cars. 

If we are legally responsible and divinely responsible, then I think we should be trained and actually be responsible. 

Think about this and pray about it.  You will reach the conclusion that the U.S. Constitution was inspired, the 2^nd Amendment allows us to fulfill the responsibility to protect ourselves and our families. 

Get trained and be a force to be reckoned with.  Be as Porter Rockwell.  Use the OPR Philosophy.

Semper Paratus

Check 6

Burn

Defending The Church Online and Off

 My haters seem to ebb and flow.  It seems every 6 months or so I seem to get “hate mail” from those who disagree with me.  I’m a big boy, I can take it.  Sometimes they are respectful and other times I’d like to send an attack drone to take them out. (My violent side) But I feel I need to address their “fears” (I think they fear everything!)  I am not what they think I am.  Although, I may be exactly what they think I am.  It depends on how you see me.  I know that it doesn’t seem, but I really can’t worry about how you readers (or anyone else) view me. 

I’m a defender. I have experience with, and training in, violence.  I will defend the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints against all comers.  I’ve been compared to DezNat and Danites. I’ve got no problem with that. The following is by “JP Bellum” who founded the DezNat hashtag.

 

“By J.P. Bellum   

A user guide for the Faithful Latter-day Saint wading through Twitter and the purpose of #DezNat

Upon logging onto Twitter for the first time a faithful member of the Restored Church of Jesus Christ is faced with a world of decisions. You have almost direct access to anyone in the world provided they also have a Twitter account. You might follow some of your favorite sports teams, your favorite actors, maybe some political leaders you side with, and of course, you’d follow the official Twitter account of Russell M. Nelson, the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Then as you begin on this journey through social media you notice hashtags that fellow saints use to make their thoughts and opinions more accessible. 

Twitter’s algorithm accounts for the tweets you “like” and retweet and begins to make suggestions for new people you could follow. You like being part of a worldwide community of Saints, so you follow them. But then you notice something: not all of the voices you hear online in the church are saying the same thing. Some are disagreeing, and even worse, some are attacking the church and its leaders. Politics has been infused with the religious and devotional conversation on Latter-day Saint Twitter. People are taking stances against the doctrine and the Brethren leading the church, and murmuring is creeping in everywhere. You think to yourself, “Is this what everyone else thinks? Am I alone in my devotion to the principles of the gospel? Why are those most vocal against the Church getting the most likes and retweets?” You are then faced with a choice: you either adjust your testimony to fit in with the great and spacious criticism of the church online or you give up on that part of social media forever as lost to the Enemy. To the faithful still on Twitter, you were the reinforcements that never arrived

 

I was at that very crossroads in August of 2018. Something had to be done or I had to leave Twitter. As is usually the case sometimes we have to look backward to go forward. Deseret was the answer. When the Saints fled Nauvoo and eventually found their way to the Salt Lake Valley, they established a government and political boundary. They called it Deseret and used the beehive as its symbol. Their bid to become a state was rejected multiple times and the name Utah was given to them. Deseret was what could have been if the federal government had left the church, lead by Brigham Young, to rule themselves. It was to be a safe haven for members of the church and fellow believers in the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ. All were welcome as long as they recognized God’s authority and were willing to work together to build the Kingdom of God. This was my inspiration to start a new hashtag that would be welcoming to all who were willing to build the kingdom and defend the church and its leaders online. 

Before Twitter expanded the length of its tweets to 240 characters, hashtags had to be compact and succinct. Deseret Nation was shortened to “Dez,” as we all pronounce the “s” in Deseret as a “z,” and “Nat” for Nation. I was proud of my own pioneer heritage and wanted to honor them building a civilization in a difficult part of the national geography just as those who use the tag today are building an online community in a very hostile environment.  So, in August 2018, I began simply by sharing quotes, scriptures, pictures, and opinions supportive of the church, its leaders, and the Family Proclamation. It started slow, but as more and more noticed that I was supportive of the church and not backing down from defending it, #DezNat started to catch on and I was noticed not only by other faithful members but by some of the Church’s largest detractors.

#DezNat may not be to everyone’s taste. Those who use the hashtag can be combative, rude, crass, aggressive, even mean. However, one thing you will never have to worry about with #DezNat is that when the prophet speaks, we listen, and when he directs, we obey. We’ve been called Danites (this topic deserves its own blog post) and worse, but the truth of the matter is if we were asked to cease, we would do so immediately. There are many ways to use the tag. I still post quotes and scriptures that have fortified my faith and strengthened my testimony and I invite all who want to use the tag to support the Church and the Brethren to use it to share their faith on Twitter and elsewhere.

More than anything, #DezNat is a banner waving in the midst of a battle. The battlefield is Twitter and beyond and #DezNat was created for the purpose of being a rallying point and a symbol to the faithful and unapologetic and for those who are firm in the faith and are still out there fighting for what we believe to be right. 

#DezNat is not a movement, it is not political (especially not alt-right), racial, national, or sexual. It is simply a hashtag used by members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints who are unapologetic about their belief in the restored Gospel, Christ as our Savior, Joseph Smith as the prophet of the Restoration, and Russell M Nelson as God’s current prophet, seer, and revelator on the earth today.

• We do not agitate for change within the Church but anxiously seek to submit our wills to that of the Lord — as revealed through His proper channels and authorities.
• We believe in and support The Family: A Proclamation to the World and recognize the family as the foundation of both earthly and celestial civilization.
• We are not limited by a one-dimensional, overly simplistic view of a Christ who teaches that only unconditional acceptance is true love. We know that Christ was both the Jehovah of the Old Testament and the “meek and lowly lamb” of the New. When He returns, we will see and know Him in all His power and glory.
• Those who use the hashtag will and do vary in our personalities, countries of origin, views of the world, family situations, goals, and ambitions — and we all gladly place any other desire or belief at the feet of the Lord.

While the questions, conditions, and problems of the world may be myriad, our response is simple — we follow the prophet.” 

On August 23, 2021 an Apostle, Elder Jeffery R Holland, gave a devotional at BYU Provo. He spoke about how BYU has changed and how it needs to be. I believe because of some members and non-members, BYU has had this change come about. Because liberal, or extreme left, ideologies have crept into this school, it is no longer what it used to be. BYU doesn’t always uphold the gospel of Jesus Christ. This is in some areas with some professors and students. I believe it should be rooted out, and I believe Elder Holland agrees. This talk was very controversial. Many members (my guess is progmos and other left leaners) had a real problem with it. I believe Elder Holland wanted a change at BYU. He defended the gospel tirelessly. Detractors of the gospel already have hit Elder Holland and his “militant” attitudes.  In the words of WWII General Anthony McAuliffe “Nuts!”

I’m not concerned about detractors and progressive members of the church opinions.  They would call me a militant Mormon, violent, and inflexible.  I would agree with them.  Not really though I’m not militant or violent unless I have to be.  Inflexible?  Maybe.  But be that as it may, these are the same people who howled about Elder Gilbert being called as an Apostle because he was the one who straightened out some of the failed BYU policies that Elder Holland talked about in his talk.  These are also the ones who think letting sisters be Sunday School Presidencies is a step toward giving sisters the priesthood.  Yea, I know who they are.  I’m sure they follow Kate Kelly on “X” and have a lifetime subscription to the Salt Lake Tribune.  I guess what I’m trying to say is “Bring it the heck on!”  I’m not skeered of any buffoon that thinks they can attack the church’s policies and doctrines.  I’m certainly not scared of anyone who wants to attack the church physically. “Bring that on too!”  I think that persecution of the church will get worse and being prepared is essential. 

So, my haters can hate, and the church’s enemies can suck it!  Members of the church should take heed, prepare and train.  It will benefit you in many ways.

Semper Paratus

Check 6

Burn

Hard Times Create Strong Men and Teaching Resilient Children

 Contrary to widespread belief, the quote “Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times” is not an ancient proverb or classical philosophical insight. Instead, it originates from the mind of G. Michael Hopf, an American author and U.S. combat veteran born in 1970, who included this line in his 2016 post-apocalyptic novel “Those Who Remain,” the seventh book in his “New World” series.

In the early 1970s, scientist John B Calhoun conducted his famous “Universe 25” experiment, creating a “mouse utopia” with unlimited food, water, and shelter.  In these ideal conditions, the mouse population grew rapidly before collapsing as social behaviors deteriorated and reproduction ceased.  While not a literal prediction, the experiment serves as a powerful metaphor for how prosperity and social disconnection can erode purpose and cohesion in human societies.

American society is not yet in collapse, but fragmentation is evident: deep political polarization, eroded trust in institutions, and fading shared norms.  Many retreats into online echo chambers, curating realities that shield them from real-world friction.  This produces phenomena resembling Universe 25’s “isolated females” (seen in aggressive or entitled behaviors like “Karens”) and “beautiful males” (withdrawn, self-focused, feminized men).

Both on the left and the right, good times have allowed us to forget what we learned in the hard times that got us through those hard times into the good. Should we not soon turn back, both the left and right will have to relearn.

 

Hard times have a lot of complications for the weak that created them.  Particularly for the LDS priesthood holder.  It’s more than just being a wimp.  It’s being afraid of change and your shadow.  It’s dealing with “woke” ideas and becoming self-sufficient so that you can raise self-sufficient children.

 

Brothers it doesn’t take that much to change the men in the church.  Don’t accept woke ideas.  Call out those leaders who are trying to make this church like our government.  Remind everyone of the doctrine behind “The family a proclamation to the world.”  I’m not saying we should be unkind or mean, but we need to be bold about the truth and about our lives.

Years ago, I lived in a District and a Branch.  I was called to the District High Council.  I had a District President who was from Minnesota.  He and I did not agree politically.  But we were friends and enjoyed talking with each other to get that other view. In one particular meeting he would not stop talking about a particular political subject.  He wanted to debate and I kept telling him that this was not the time or place for such a discussion.  He would not let up and so I finally said some rude things that silenced the room.  (The good brother sitting next to me whispered to me, “Now you’ve done it!  Good job!”) Most people would not talk to a priesthood leader that way.  I would normally not talk that way to my priesthood leader either but I had to jar him back into reality so he would stop trying to talk about inappropriate things in a meeting where other things should be happening.  My tactic worked!  Later on, I apologized and he said, “You had to shock me back into reality.  I know you didn’t have a choice because I was not listening.”  I was glad he understood and our relationship was not damaged.  Over the years you have learned that you can stand up to a priesthood leader if you do it in a respectful and kind way.  Many people will not do this, but a left-leaning leader can do a lot of damage in a ward.  Politics doesn’t belong in Church.  But many people let their extreme views, left or right leaning, spill into their teaching and speaking at Church.  If that view is in opposition to gospel doctrine it must be corrected. The Church has solid stances on Gay marriage, abortion, and gender.  I don’t have a problem with the people that believe in opposition to this doctrine, but these points are non-negotiable.  And they have no place at Church.  Many believe the Church will “come around” concerning these doctrines and that the Church will change.  My contention is that will never happen.  Policy changes, doctrine does not.

Learning to be a man and then stepping into that role is something that seems to be lacking in some generations.  My kids were given responsibility early in their lives.  We have a large family and we all needed to help to care for ourselves, and our home.  Kids have an amazing capacity.  They can do a lot!  At 8 our kids learned, and were responsible for, their own laundry.  When our Grandkids visit they are given the same responsibility at the appropriate age.  Our kids also had chores they got allowance for but also some they had to do out of duty being a member of the family.  I made sure they understood that because we do have an obligation to each other as family members.

 

 Teaching boys to be men and raising resilient kids so they don’t have to take resilience classes should be every parent’s goal.  The Church now offers resiliency classes, I understand why.  It’s taught in seminary now. What the heck?  I’m an LDS Seminary graduate but I never had a class or a lesson in being resilient.  My Dad fought in WWII.  My parents went through that world war and through the Depression.  They could handle whatever was put before them. So, they raised us kids to weather whatever storm they were put through.  My wife and I were children of the 60’s and 70’s.  We were taught how to work and how to survive.  

 

The men of the church need to stop being “nice” and start being men. Being nice is not the same as being kind. We should be kind. Families need to be resilient because Christ is coming. Looking at the signs we know life is poised to be worse. Certain prophecies must be fulfilled and that means things will get worse in this world. We need men who will bear up the church and the gospel. We should be defenders of the faith. It’s hard to defend from a safe space. LDS men should be meek but not push overs. That’s why boys need to be taught to be men. 

 

“Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times”

 

We are moving into those “hard times”. LDS men and boys need to learn what the 3 P’s are from the Proclamation on the Family. 

What does it mean to preside, provide, and protect?

That’s what we can talk about and teach. Dirty Civilian focus on the Christian preparedness side. The LDS perspective is similar, but with the priesthood comes a higher responsibility.

Boys (and girls for that matter) need to learn physical work.  One of my sons is a computer developer.  One is a welder.  They grew up the same, but the welder likes physical work for his mind and body.  The developer takes care of himself and exercises, but he prefers the more cerebral work of working on software.  Both of them (and our daughters and other brothers) moved rocks.  When we bought our property there was a large pile of stone with rocks about the size of 2 bricks.  We seemed to need this rock pile moved for construction projects and other reasons to move the location of the stone.  So, our kids were given so many rocks to move when they got in trouble.  We did spank our kids but not that often and even less as they got older.  They were given work in addition to the chores they already had.  They were given other tasks sometimes and not always rock moving.  It was physically hard work, but they knew if they complained they could get more rocks.  All my kids know how to work.  It’s interesting because the guys my girls married aren’t necessarily DIY guys.  So, my girls have tool bags, and they work on things as they need to.  Their spouses are getting better, but my girls are hard workers.

One of our family’s sayings is actually from my son-in-law.  “Suck it up, cupcake!” With this mindset our children were not raised to need safe spaces and could handle most everything that has been thrown at them.  They are resilient. I believe it’s our responsibility as parents to bring up our children to handle life and what it throws at you.  To learn from adversity and to become stronger from trials.

There are generations that are soft because their parents wanted things better for them.  I understand that feeling but fight it and teach them how to navigate life themselves.

I had a Stake President growing up who was a millionaire.  His children did not know until they were young adults.  The kids had work at home and jobs to pay for cars and college.  Dad could have just paid for it all, but he and his wife wanted resilient, prepared children.

I hope the men in the church can figure this problem out and stop producing unprepared, dependent children.  I also hope they can change the way the church does things and stop being so timid about running the Lord’s Church.

 

Semper Paratus

Check 6

Burn